The Language of the Night
Topic: books, fantasy, nonfiction, science fiction, writing|Originally published thirty years ago, this collection of essays, speeches, and introductions by Ursula K. Le Guin is a must for any writer, student, teacher, or reader of science fiction and fantasy. My political and religious views could not be more different than this great writer’s, but as one who falls into the four aforementioned categories, I agree with her in most every other way, and am grateful that she has been around to give words to so much that defines the craft. I can do no better than to note those parts of the collection that speak to me the most closely:
Absolute freedom is absolute responsibility. The writer’s job, as I see it, is to tell the truth.
Artists are people who are not at all interested in the facts – only in the truth. You get the facts from the outside. The truth you get from inside.
If you want to strike out in any new direction – you go alone. With a machete in your hand and the fear of God in your heart.
When the genuine myth rises into consciousness, that is always its message. You must change your life.
Fantasy is the natural, the appropriate language for the recounting of the spiritual journey and the struggle of good and evil in the soul.
It is above all by the imagination that we achieve perception, and compassion, and hope.
There are, however, two instances in which I do not quite understand Le Guin’s stance. Why is poetry held separate from fiction in these situations? Maybe someone out there can offer insight:
The lovable rogue, the romantic criminal, the revolutionary Satan are essentially literary creations, not met with in daily life. They are embodiments of desire, types of the soul; thus their vitality is immense and lasting; but they are better suited to poetry and drama than to the novel (141).
Always the book one imagines and the book one writes are different things. The one exists objectively, a scribbled manuscript or so many thousand printed copies. The other exists subjectively. It is the other’s first cause and final cause. Toward it the written book, during its writing, continually strives, like the image in a mirror approaching the person moving toward it. But they do not merge. Only in poetry, which breaks all barriers, do the two ever meet, each becoming the other (140).
1 Comment »

Infineon






